• Users Online: 45
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
COMMENTARY
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 201

Evidence that gaseous anesthesia may be due to neuronal hypoxia


Emeritus Professor of Medicine, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK

Date of Submission26-Aug-2020
Date of Decision26-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance26-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication25-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
MB, ChB, DIH, PhD, FFOM Philip B James
Professor Emeritus
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.304227

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
James PB. Evidence that gaseous anesthesia may be due to neuronal hypoxia. Med Gas Res 2020;10:201

How to cite this URL:
James PB. Evidence that gaseous anesthesia may be due to neuronal hypoxia. Med Gas Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 20];10:201. Available from: https://www.medgasres.com/text.asp?2020/10/4/201/304227



Despite much research the mode of action of gaseous anesthetic agents has proven elusive since the use of ether was first reported by Morton and Parkman in 1847. As anesthetic gas mixtures contain at least 20% oxygen and the minimum alveolar concentration of an anesthetic agent producing an immobilizing effect does not change over a wide range of inspired oxygen concentrations, it would appear unlikely that hypoxia is involved. However, normal levels of oxygen in blood cannot ensure adequate oxygen tensions within cells and intracellular oxygen concentrations cannot be measured.

The progression and reversibility of neurological deficits due to hypoxia, from leg immobility to unconsciousness, were published in the Lancet in 1862 by James Glaisher[1] after a balloon ascent to an altitude equivalent to the height of Everest. Aware of these exploits, Claude Bernard in 1875 suggested hypoxia may be involved in anesthesia produced by volatile agents, as did Verworn in 1912 but were unable to produce evidence. At the turn of the century, Meyer[2] and Overton[3] observed that gaseous anesthetics have a high lipid to water solubility ratio but, although this has been confirmed, it has been found that molecules that have similarly high lipid solubility are not anesthetics. They are now classified as “non-immobilizers.”

The discovery of the protein hypoxia-inducible factor 1, the subject of the award of the 2019 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, has provided a unique marker of intracellular hypoxia. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 has been detected when a sub-anesthetic concentration of xenon and oxygen is breathed to simulate the hypoxia induced at high-altitude. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and the effector hormone, erythropoietin, are up-regulated by hypoxia and the effect lasts many hours longer than an exposure induced by breathing a low oxygen partial pressure.[4]

In 1961, Linus Pauling[5] published “A Molecular Theory of General Anesthesia” observing that gaseous anesthetic agents are, firstly, non-hydrogen bonding and, secondly, they form clathrates – lattices of water molecules in membranes, which trap gas molecules by van der Waals forces. His paper discusses xenon, which is inert under biological conditions, but an excellent anesthetic. [Figure 1] shows the diagram of the lattice from his paper representing xenon.
Figure 1: The structure of the 12-Å hydrate crystals of small molecules, such as xenon.
Note: The unit cube is about 12 Å on an edge. The hydrogen-bonded framework of water molecules consists of 46 water molecules per unit cube. Of these, there are two sets of 20 at the corners of pentagonal dodecahedra, one about the corner of the cube and one about the center of the cube. Six more water molecules aid in holding the dodecahedra together by hydrogen bonds. All hydrogen bonds, indicated by lines in the figure, are about 2.76 Å long, as in ordinary ice. There is room in each dodecahedron for a small molecule; a symbol suggesting a molecule of H2 O or H2 S is shown. Reprinted with permission from the American Association for the Advancement of Science.[5]


Click here to view


Other inert gases, for example, argon, also produce anesthesia at the higher concentrations possible by increasing ambient pressure, as does nitrogen. As no chemical reaction is involved, this suggests a physical basis as the mechanism of anesthesia. Pauling suggested that hydrates may “decrease the rate of chemical reactions by entrapping reactant molecules,” but did not discuss oxygen, the most critical agent in the maintenance of consciousness, despite having invented the paramagnetic oxygen analyzer. Oxygen is poorly soluble in water and hydrates by causing perturbations of cell membranes[6] may impede oxygen transport into neurons and reduce mitochondrial production of adenosine triphosphate.

Neurons are certainly sensitive to hypoxia: respiring a gas not containing oxygen causes immediate loss of consciousness.[7] However, the concept of the “idling” neuron in which minimal levels of blood flow and, therefore, oxygen delivery can maintain cell viability without functional capability is now well-accepted.[8] The many effects relevant to general anesthesia observed in studies of xenon may follow reductions in oxidative phosphorylation induced by hypoxia in the many regions of the nervous system.[9] It remains to be seen if hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is detectable with other gaseous anesthetic agents.

The author is pleased to acknowledge helpful discussions with friend and colleague Duncan Black PhD FRCS.

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by the author before publication.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Open access statement: This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.



 
  References Top

1.
Glaisher J. Notes of effects experienced during recent balloon ascents. Lancet. 1862;80:559-560.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Meyer H. Zur theorie der alkoholnarkose. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1901;46:338-346.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Overton E. Studien über die Narkose: zugleich ein Beitrag zur allgemeinen Pharmakologie. Jena, Switzerland: Gustav Fischer. 1901.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Stoppe C, Ney J, Brenke M, et al. Sub-anesthetic xenon increases erythropoietin levels in humans: a randomized controlled trial. Sports Med. 2016;46:1753-1766.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pauling L. A molecular theory of general anesthesia. Science. 1961;134:15-21.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Koubi L, Tarek M, Bandyopadhyay S, Klein ML, Scharf D. Membrane structural perturbations caused by anesthetics and nonimmobilizers: a molecular dynamics investigation. Biophys J. 2001;81:3339-3345.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
James PB, Calder IM. Anoxic asphyxia--a cause of industrial fatalities: a review. J R Soc Med. 1991;84:493-495.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Astrup J, Siesjö BK, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral ischemia - the ischemic penumbra. Stroke. 1981;12:723-725.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Özugur S, Kunz L, Straka H. Relationship between oxygen consumption and neuronal activity in a defined neural circuit. BMC Biol. 2020;18:76.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed166    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]